Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Patrick Maraist v. Alan Rose, et al
as 23-12012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK MARAIST and MARAIST LAW FIRM
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN BENJAMIN ROSE, ROBERT ABRUZZO, TIMOTHY WARREN SCHULZ and others
Maraist Law Firm, PA, et al v. Alan Rose, et al
as 23-12030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARAIST LAW FIRM, PA, PATRICK MARAIST and MARAIST LAW FIRM
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN BENJAMIN ROSE, ROBERT ABRUZZO, TIMOTHY WARREN SCHULZ and others
Maraist Law Firm, PA, et al v. Howard Coates, Jr., et al
as 23-10994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARAIST LAW FIRM, PA and PATRICK MARAIST
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD KELLY COATES, JR., CYMONIE ROWE, FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY and others
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05014
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WARREN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patrick Maraist v. Howard Coates, Jr., et al
as 22-11412
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK MARAIST
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD KELLY COATES, JR., CYMONIE ROWE, FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY and others
Smith v. Staly et al
as 3:2020cv01162
Plaintiff:
Timothy Warren Smith and Nicholas A. Rienzi
Defendant:
Mr. Kyle Gaddie, Mr. Tietje, Rick Staly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74216
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WARREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Sanks et al
as 4:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Roland Jones, Keith Sade, Jason Ellis and others
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Nathan Brooks, Robin Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connecticut General Lift Insurance Company v. Warren et al
as 5:2007cv00075
Defendant:
Jeanette Warren, Mary Graves, Vivian Fletcher and others
Plaintiff:
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
