Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Attica Scott, et alIn re: Attica Scott, et al
as 24-501
Petitioner:
In re: ATTICA SCOTT, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, CORBIN SMITH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, KAYLA MEISNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY METRO GOVERNMENT, GREG FISCHER, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Louisville, KY, ROBERT SCHROEDER, individually and in his official capacity as Interim Chief of the Louisville Metropolitan Police Department and others
USA v. Ivoree Tinsley
as 22-3319
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
IVOREE TINSLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tinsley v. Montgomery Lynch & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02584
Plaintiff:
Lutdale Tinsley
Defendant:
Montgomery Lynch & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tinsley et al v. ATM Network, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00740
Plaintiff:
Donald Tinsley and Cherie Tinsley
Defendant:
ATM Network, Inc. and John Doe 1, 2, 3 unknown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Tinsley v. ATM International Services, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2011cv00677
Plaintiff:
Donald Tinsley
Defendant:
ATM International Services, L.L.C. and John Doe 1, 2, 3 unknown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
