Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Winn v. Tinsley
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
James Winn
Defendant:
Boyd Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Tinsley v. O'Malley
as 24-1913
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS E. TINSLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Community Realty Property Management, Inc. et al v. Glaude et al
as 3:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Community Realty Property Management, Inc., Victor Marr, Jessica Ardell-Smith and others
Defendant:
Donald Glaude, Frederick E. Tinsley and Senora Glaude
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramtin Zakikhani, et al v. Hyundai Motor Company, et al
as 23-55621
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAMTIN ZAKIKHANI, KIMBERLY ELZINGA, STEVEN OSTERMAN and others
Appellant:
MICHAEL A. GRAHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY and HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA
(HC) Tinsley v. Hill
as 2:2023cv01036
Petitioner:
Donald E. Tinsley
Respondent:
T Hill and T. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tinsley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05471
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Heather Tinsley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tinsley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Douglas E Tinsley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
59 Carol Lane, LP v. Tinsley
as 4:2022cv03959
Plaintiff:
59 Carol Lane, LP
Defendant:
Jolene Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
