Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Knox v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv06275
Petitioner:
Tito L. Knox and Tito Lemont Knox
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tito Knox v. Jeffrey Krueger
as 23-7184
Petitioner / Appellant:
TITO LEMONT KNOX
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY KRUEGER
Tito Knox v. Officer Graham
as 23-7177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITO LEMONT KNOX
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER GRAHAM, JOE BIDEN, S. RICE and others
Tito Knox v. Henry Herlong, Jr.
as 23-7172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITO LEMONT KNOX, a/k/a Geraldine Knox, a/k/a Nicklos J. Watts
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY M. HERLONG, JR., District Court Judge, DONALD C. COGGINS, JR., District Court Judge, GREENVILLE COUNTY POLICE COMMISSIONER and others
Knox v. Herlong, Jr. et al
as 0:2023cv03697
Plaintiff:
Tito Lemont Knox, Geraldine Knox and Nicklos J Watts
Defendant:
Henry Herlong, Jr., Donald C. Coggins, Jr., Greenville County Police Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Knox v. Graham et al
as 0:2023cv02317
Plaintiff:
Tito Lemont Knox
Defendant:
Officer Graham, Joe Bidden, S. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Knox v. Creech et al
as 0:2008cv03651
Plaintiff:
Tito Lemont Knox
Defendant:
David M Creech and Karl F Bodtorf
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tito Knox v. Rt. Graham
as 08-6944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITO LEMONT KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
RT. GRAHAM, Officer and DEPT. GARNER, JE 0136
Tito Knox v. US
as 08-6870
Petitioner - Appellant:
TITO LEMONT KNOX
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Knox v. United States of America
as 9:2007cv01792
Petitioner:
Tito Lemont Knox
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
