Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Blue et al v. Chickasha City of
as 5:2020cv01210
Plaintiff:
Duke R Keeling, James C Calhoun, Michael Wise and others
Defendant:
Chickasha City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Youngevity International v. Wakaya Perfection et al
as 2:2020cv00640
Defendant:
Todd B. Smith, William Andreoli and Wakaya Perfection A Utah limited liability company doing business as Bulavita
Plaintiff:
Youngevity International
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Smith (ID 74848) v. United States Marshal
as 5:2015cv03079
Petitioner:
Todd Carlton Smith
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Schnurr, et al
as 13-3267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD CARLTON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN SCHNURR, SUSAN MEHLER and PERRY SCHUETZ, M.D.
:
Smith v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2013cv03177
Plaintiff:
Todd Carlton Smith
Defendant:
Dan Schnurr , Susan Mehler and Perry Schuetz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fromm et al
as 5:2012cv03042
Defendant:
Darrell Fromm and (fnu) Garcia
Plaintiff:
Todd Carlton Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Smith v. Cummings, et al
as 11-3339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD CARLTON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN LAFRINERE
Defendant:
WILLIAM CUMMINGS, Kansas Department of Corrections, in his official and individual capacity, RAY ROBERTS, Kansas Department of Corrections, in his official and individual capacity, DON THOMAS, Kansas Department of Corrections, in his official and individual capacity and others
Smith v. United State of America
as 5:2010cv03243
Plaintiff:
Todd Carlton Smith
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv03231
Petitioner:
Todd Carlton Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv03106
Petitioner:
Todd Carlton Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
