Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pharaoh Illum'maati v. Kenneth Bailey, et al
as 21-5244
Defendant / Appellee:
DENISE DAVIDSON, Assistant Warden, ANGELA WARREN, SAMANTHA DAUGHERTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHARAOH ILLUM'MAATI, aka Mateem Malik Hudson
Illum'maati v. Bailey et al
as 3:2020cv00546
Defendant:
Kenneth Bailey, Denise Davidson, Todd Browning and others
Plaintiff:
Pharaoh Illum'maati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browning v. Educational Management Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv01305
Plaintiff:
Todd Browning
Defendant:
Educational Management Corporation and Art Institute of Tennessee-Nashville, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
USA v. Lilly et al
as 3:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Stacy L. Lilly, Michael Todd Brown and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Lilly et al
as 3:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Stacy L. Lilly, Michael Todd Brown and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA v. Lilly et al
as 3:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Stacy Lilly, Michael Todd Brown and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
David Brown, et al v. Dal-Tile Corporation, et al
as 10-5802
Plaintiff:
DAVID TODD BROWN
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC. and AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANIES
Defendant - Appellee:
DAL-TILE CORPORATION, MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. and ALADDIN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, INC.
Brown v. Dal-Tile Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
David Todd Brown
Defendant:
Dal-Tile Corporation , Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Aladdin Mfg. Corporation, Inc.
Movant:
Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dalton v. Government Acquisitions, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00484
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Dalton
Defendant:
Government Acquisitions, Inc., Dennis Obial and Todd Brown
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
