Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Burchett v. Bates
as 6:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Eugene S. Burchett
Respondent:
Tom Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fontenot v. Ada, City of et al
as 6:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Karl Fontenot
Defendant:
Ada, City of, Mike Baskin, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Clardy et al
as 6:2020cv00471
Defendant:
Kevin Clardy, Citytellacoin, Tom Pittman and others
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Ray and Eric Shawn Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Midship Pipeline Company, LLC v. 2.331, 2.435, 0.458 acres, Bryan County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2018cv00302
Defendant:
1.545, 1.447, 0.154, Bryan County, Oklahoma, Anna Kathryn Chappa, Tom Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Midship Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Kindle v. Youngwolfe et al
as 6:2018cv00209
Defendant:
Jenanna Thornton, Lucy Blackbird, Tom Pheasant and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen Kindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Carver v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00409
Plaintiff:
Tom E. Carver
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robballaa v. Vilsack
as 6:2016cv00376
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Robballaa
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Newman et al v. United States of America et al
as 6:2015cv00400
Plaintiff:
Fior Newman and Robert Newman
Defendant:
United States of America, Sylvia Mathews Burwell, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Chance et al v. Vandiver et al
as 6:2015cv00206
Defendant:
Sandy Vandiver, Miranda McKinney, Pat Strayhorn and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Mac Chance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Anderson
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Tyrone Spears, Tammy Trouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
