Cases 21 - 30 of 251
Nunn v. Miller et al
as 1:2014cv00978
Plaintiff:
Ray Nunn
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Tom Clements, Mike Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumpter v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2014cv00195
Plaintiff:
Ross Sumpter
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Ari Zavaras, Tom Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perrian v. Harms et al
as 1:2013cv02951
Plaintiff:
Randy Perrian
Defendant:
Allen Harms, Allen (I) Harms, Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curren v. Clements et al
as 1:2013cv02342
Petitioner:
John Estel Curren
Respondent:
Tom Clements and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simmons v. Werholtz, et al
as 13-1282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEO SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director (CDOC), JAMES FALK, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility and ANDREA WILSON, Time and Release/Tech III
Von Halley v. Bartsch, et al
as 13-1263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY VON HALLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT BARTSCH, Personal Capacity, Civil Action, TOM CLEMENTS and ROGER WERHOLTZ, et al., Civil Action
Hurd v. Martin-Forman et al
as 2:2013cv04145
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Hurd
Defendant:
Marty Martin-Forman, Janet Heyer, Ian Linenfelser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schupper v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 13-1202
Petitioner - Appellant:
SANFORD B. SCHUPPER
Respondent - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Executive Director and others
Payton v. Werholtz, et al
as 13-3115
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER ALMON PAYTON
Respondent - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, FNU LNU, Secretary of Corrections, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Fisher v. Werholtz, et al
as 13-1173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMON L. FISHER
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, TRAVIS TRANI, Warden CCF/CSP, SEAN FOSTER, Assoc. Warden CCF/CSP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
