Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Valenti v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Toni Ann Valenti
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rudd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Rudd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gatewood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Gatewood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Parks v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv04529
Plaintiff:
Tony Dwayne Parks
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Valenti v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00611
Plaintiff:
Toni Ann Valenti
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Drinkard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Toni Lynn Drinkard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00833
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tony D. Jenkins
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thedford v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2019cv01120
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Tony Thedford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Geans v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00368
Plaintiff:
Tony Geans
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Valenti v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv10293
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Toni Ann Valenti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
