Cases 1 - 10 of 363
Garsee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Tony Garsee and Kaye Garsee
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joseph v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Joseph
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Fenstermaker vs Warden Southeastern Correctional Inst.
as 2:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Tony Fenstermaker
Respondent:
Norm Robinson and Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Eicher v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04009
Plaintiff:
Tony Eicher
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelms v. Madison et al
as 2:2023cv03663
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Nelms, Sr.
Defendant:
Director James Madison, Luci, Mike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fannon v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03237
Plaintiff:
Tony Fannon
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hickland v. Cincinnati et al
as 1:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Michael S Hickland
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Toni Nash, Carol Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Baines et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02576
Plaintiff:
Lascelles Leroy Baines and Toni A. Baines
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
