Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Pearson v. Patterson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00454
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Patterson et al
as 1:2013cv00262
Petitioner:
Carl Arthur Perry, Jr.
Respondent:
Tony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Patterson et al
as 1:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
Jon Johnson
Defendant:
Tony Patterson, G. Gibens, James Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. State of Alabama
as 1:2013cv00169
Petitioner:
Jerry Hammond
Respondent:
Tony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Hetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kim Thomas, Michael Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hetzel
as 1:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
Myron Cantrell Jones
Respondent:
Tony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Patterson et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
James William Bailey, IV
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Patterson et al
as 2:2012cv04185
Petitioner:
Michael Lamar Howard
Respondent:
Tony Patterson and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Patterson
as 1:2012cv00752
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hunt
Defendant:
Tony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Patterson et al
as 1:2012cv00732
Petitioner:
Gary Eugene Walker
Respondent:
Tony Patterson and Mobile County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
