Cases 1 - 10 of 1,947
Torres v. MN Contracting Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv03119
Plaintiff:
Cecilio Torres
Defendant:
MN Contracting Corp. doing business as MN Contracting, VC Legacy Contracting Corp. doing business as VC Legacy Contracting, Matias Cardozo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gardner et al v. Caridi et al
as 1:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
Philip Gardner, Patrick Wade and Craft House, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Caridi, Vincent Lima, Sean Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Torres v. Torres
as 3:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Mayce Torres
Defendant:
Juan Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
C.O. MS. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP et al
as 1:2024cv02761
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres
Defendant:
Sher Tremonte LLP, Justin M. Sher, Michael Tremonte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Pedro Torres
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06205
Plaintiff:
Emijacsiul Torres Negron
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
