Cases 11 - 20 of 4,376
United States v. Miguel Silva-Torres, Jr.
as 24-1766
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Miguel Silva-Torres, Jr.
v. Naturalization Ceremony 04/23/2024
as 3:2024mc80088
Not Yet Classified:
Adriana Denisse Aguirre, Ali Marzoughi, Jonathan Galvez and others
US v. Lugo-Montalvo
as 24-1344
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ALAN LUGO-MONTALVO, a/k/a Allan Lugo-Montalvo
Interested Party:
EMMA M. GREENWOOD, OSCAR JOSE SERRANO NEGRON and KEHYLIS YOLANDA VAZQUEZ-TORRES
Cristian Torres v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1558
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN NOEL TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Perez Torres v. Garland
as 24-2158
Petitioner:
DANIEL ENRIQUE PEREZ TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Torres, et al. v. Jayco, Inc.
as 24-2164
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY TORRES, LUIS TORRES and Dotty Torres
Defendant:
JAYCO, INC., an Indiana Corporation
US v. Rodriguez-Torres
as 24-1319
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ-TORRES
US v. Rodriguez-Torres
as 24-1320
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL LUIS RODRIGUEZ-TORRES
Kotler v. Torres
as 24-879
Plaintiff:
KERRY KOTLER
Defendant:
PEDRO TORRES, DAISY RODRIGUEZ, JOHN DOE #1 and others
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant:
LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party:
FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
