Cases 1 - 10 of 469
Sauber et al v. Outfox Hospitality LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03374
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sauber and Miguel Torres
Defendant:
Outfox Hospitality LLC, Foxtrot Retail, Inc. and Doms Market, LLC.
Torres v. Tate et al
as 3:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres
Defendant:
Levencia Tate and Noah Beltramea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bassett Sr. v. Righteous et al
as 3:2024cv50126
Plaintiff:
Gino Bassett Sr.
Defendant:
Righteous, Gallegoes, Dalke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes-Torres v. 2112202 Alberta Ltd. et al
as 3:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Vilmer O. Reyes-Torres
Defendant:
2112202 Alberta Ltd. doing business as 6IX Logistics d/b/a Alberta Transportation Corporation and Amritpaul S. Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Torres-Consuelo v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01858
Plaintiff:
Carlos Torres-Consuelo
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Moore v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Quatwan Moore
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Reyes, Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Roxanne K Miller
Defendant:
Ivan Gonzalez, Ioan Nemes, Eric Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
