Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MANLEY et al v. CONCELLI TOYOTA OF SPRINGFIELD et al
as 2:2019cv00069
Defendant: POTAMKIN TOYOTA, INC., POTAMKIN TOYOTA NORTH, INC., CONCELLI TOYOTA OF CONSHOHOCKEN and others
Plaintiff: ANGELA BAGLIONE and MICHAEL MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05700
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00305
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
SARKIS v. SHORE TOYOTA, INC.
as 1:2016cv01184
Plaintiff: GLEN SARKIS
Defendant: SHORE TOYOTA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00281
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Janice Bullock v. Sloane Toyota Inc, et al
as 10-4037
Plaintiff - Appellant: JANICE BULLOCK
Defendant - Appellee: SLOANE TOYOTA INC, ET AL. a/k/a RGS INC., LEXUS, ET AL., JOSHUA BAKER, ET AL and others
BULLOCK v. SLOANE TOYOTA INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04196
Plaintiff: JANICE A. BULLOCK
Defendant: SLOANE TOYOTA INC., LEXUS, JOSHUA BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Clancy v. Reliance Standard Life Insuran, et al
as 09-3717
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES CLANCY
Defendant - Appellee: COMPREHENSIVE HR CO
Defendant: RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INS CO, JR GRP INC, JS RICHARDSON GRP INC and others
KIM et al v. BURTON et al
as 2:2009cv04056
Plaintiff: JIN K. KIM and JOON H. LEE
Defendant: SAMUEL BURTON, SLOANE TOYOTA, INC. and RGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Type: Torts - Injury None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00818
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?