Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Reynolds v. Rayburn Correctional Center et al
as 6:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant:
Rayburn Correctional Center, Travis Day and Karla Wheat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Day
as 22-30685
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eric Richardson
Respondent / Appellee:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Pete v. Day
as 22-30681
Petitioner / Appellant:
Norman Pete
Respondent / Appellee:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Porter v. Nicholas et al
as 2:2022cv04002
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Brian Nicholas, Travis Day, Kevin Luper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Rayburn Correctional Center et al
as 2:2022cv03483
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Rayburn Correctional Center, Travis Day, Kevin Luper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luckey v. Day
as 22-30579
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joshua Luckey
Respondent / Appellee:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center and Rayburn Correctional Center
Magee v. Day et al
as 2:2022cv02589
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Magee, Jr.
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv02473
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Harris
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, James LeBlanc, Travis Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schaffer v. Day
as 22-30452
Petitioner / Appellant:
Antione Schaffer
Respondent / Appellee:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Colvin v. Day
as 22-30368
Petitioner / Appellant:
James L. Colvin
Respondent / Appellee:
Travis Day, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
