Cases 1 - 10 of 10
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08696
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TREVOR THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAN DYKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94679
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TREVOR THOMAS VAN DYKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66439
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TREVOR THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siddique v. Laliberte et al
as 2:2015cv00001
Plaintiff:
UWM Student Association , Lena-Rose M Abu Saif , Andres Gabriel Aguilar and others
Defendant:
Michael Lovell , Board of Regents of The University of Wisconsin System , Student Association at UWM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03120
Receiver:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thomas v. Comcast Holdings Corporation
as 2:2014cv02428
Plaintiff:
Trevor Thomas
Defendant:
Comcast Holdings Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trevor Freeman v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 11-17750
Petitioner - Appellant:
TREVOR THOMAS FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT and BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Trevor Freeman v. D. Sisto, et al
as 10-17133
Petitioner - Appellant:
TREVOR THOMAS FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, Warden, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BOARD OF PAROLE HEARING and others
Freeman v. Swarthout
as 2:2010cv00731
Petitioner:
Trevor Thomas Freeman
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv02000
Petitioner:
Trevor Thomas Freeman
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto, State of California, Board of Parole Hearing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
