Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Estate of Don Rust et al v. EA Europ Assistance and GGA General Globe Assistance et al
as 2:2022cv00916
Plaintiff:
Estate of Don Rust, Gina Rust and John Rust
Defendant:
EA Europ Assistance and GGA General Globe Assistance, Trip Mate, Inc. and Trip Mate Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Otis v. Zurich America Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jill Otis and Jill L Otis
Defendant:
Zurich America Insurance Company, Kwik Trip Inc, Travis Hoover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clacks, Stanford v. Kwik Trip, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
Stanford Clacks
Defendant:
Kwik Trip, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Farrille, Charmaine v. Kwik Trip Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Kwik Trip Inc and Travis Hutzenbuhler
Plaintiff:
Charmaine R. Farrille
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ohde v. Kwik Trip Inc
as 2:2020cv01431
Plaintiff:
Bethany Ohde
Defendant:
Kwik Trip, Inc. and Kwik Trip Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Douglas, Danny v. Kwik Trip, Onlaska, WI et al
as 3:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Douglas
Defendant:
Kwik Trip, Onlaska, WI, Kwik Trip, LaCrosse, WI, King Street Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. KwikTrip, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00486
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Kwik Trip, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
