Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Fuller v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03278
Plaintiff:
Trish Fuller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc, Davol and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Taylor Communications, Inc.
as 3:2020cv02192
Defendant:
Taylor Communications, Taylor Communications, Inc. and Trish Burtch
Plaintiff:
Billy Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Oliver v. Gray et al
as 2:2019cv00619
Defendant:
Imam Sunni, Religious Service, David Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Oliver Randy and Randy Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rizer et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02559
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Rizer, Jr. and Trish Diane Rizer
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crisp v. Neel-Wilson et al
as 2:2015cv01265
Plaintiff:
Calvin Crisp
Defendant:
Trish Neel-Wilson and Michael V. Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01941
Plaintiff:
Trish N. Blake
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDavid-Walter v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21390
Plaintiff:
Trish McDavid-Walter
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ragland et al v. City of Chillicothe
as 2:2010cv00879
Plaintiff:
Franklin Ragland , Meri Kate Enterprises, LP , Thomas Gustin and others
Defendant:
City of Chillicothe, Richard Johnson, Michele Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vavrina v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2010cv01022
Plaintiff:
Trish Vavrina
Defendant:
Ann B. Gonzalez and Daniel Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
