Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smocks v. Preston Heights Apartments
as 24-40016
Plaintiff:
Troy Anthony Smocks
Defendant:
Preston Heights Apartments and Preston Heights Apartments, L.L.C.
Smocks v. USA
as 23-10746
Petitioner / Appellant:
Troy Anthony Smocks
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
SMOCKS v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv03681
Plaintiff:
TROY ANTHONY SMOCKS
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smocks v United States of America The
as 4:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
Troy Anthony Smocks
Defendant:
United States of America The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Smocks v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv02662
Petitioner:
Troy Anthony Smocks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03534
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Troy Smocks
as 22-3087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Troy Anthony Smocks, also known as Kenneth Harris, also known as Tony Sanders, also known as Vincent Shelton, also known as Troy Perez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00838
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Troy SmocksIn re: Troy Smocks
as 22-40635
Petitioner:
In re: Troy Anthony Smocks
Respondent:
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Smocks v. Preston Heights Apartments et al
as 4:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Troy Anthony Smocks
Defendant:
Preston Heights Apartments and Preston Heights Apartments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
