Cases 1 - 10 of 567
Rico Paul v. Travis Pacheco
as 22-2921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rico Paul
Defendant / Appellee:
Travis Pacheco, Correctional Officer, Individual Capacity
Defendant:
Troy Steele and Peggy Somerville
Bolden v. Steele
as 4:2022cv00631
Petitioner:
Darrell I. Bolden
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stubbs v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Anthony P Stubbs
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Mike Parson, Anne L. Precythe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stubbs v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Anthony P Stubbs
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Mike Parson, Anne L. Precythe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon McGuire v. Troy Steele
as 22-1341
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brandon C. McGuire
Respondent / Appellee:
Troy Steele
Harris v. Kempker et al
as 1:2015cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ira B. Harris
Defendant:
Gary Kempker, Ian Wallace, Corizon Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belvin Williams v. Troy Steele
as 21-3223
Petitioner / Appellant:
Belvin Leonard Williams
Respondent / Appellee:
Troy Steele
Ira Harris v. Ian Wallace, et al
as 21-1546
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Gavin, Psyciatrist, Southeast Correctional Center, Dr. Unknown McKinley, Doctor at Potosi Correctional Center, Corizon Medical Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Corizon, LLC, Troy Steele, Warden, Potosi Correctional Center, Anne L. Precythe and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ira B. Harris
Jarmon v. Steele
as 4:2021cv00101
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Petitioner:
Michael Lamar Jarmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bramlett v. Steele
as 4:2021cv00042
Petitioner:
Kenneth Bramlett and Kenneth J. Bramlett
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
