Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 di Removal- Civil Rights (Disability Act)
Associated Grocers, Inc. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv01561
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
Associated Grocers, Inc., Action Meat Distributors, Inc., Affiliated Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Associated Grocers, Inc. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02525
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATED GROCERS, INC., Action Meat Distributors, Inc., Affiliated Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Action Meat Distributors, Inc. et al v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv01454
Plaintiff:
Brookshire Grocery Company, Springfield Grocer Company, Certco, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Agri Stats, Inc., Smithfield Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Action Meat Distributors, Inc. et al v. Agri Stats Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03002
Plaintiff:
BROOKSHIRE GROCERY COMPANY, Springfield Grocer Company, The Distribution Group, Inc. (d/b/a Van Eerden Foodservice Company) and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Seaboard Foods LLC, Hormel Foods Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Action Meat Distributors, Inc. et al v. Norman W. Fries, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03471
Plaintiff:
Action Meat Distributors, Inc. , Associated Food Stores, Inc. , Bashas' Inc. and others
Defendant:
Norman W. Fries, Inc., Fieldale Farms Corporation, Foster Farms, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
