Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gentry et al v. Memphis Bell Transportation, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
Shawn Gentry, Hoa Nguyen, Thao Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Memphis Bell Transportation, LLC and Robinson Property Group, LLC doing business as Horseshoe Tunica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jose v. Maui Electric Company, Limited et al
as 1:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jose, Chi Guyer, Krystal Cunningham and others
Defendant:
Maui Electric Company, Limited, Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GARCIA v. PHO TODAY CGH LLC et al
as 2:2023cv20629
Plaintiff:
LUIS GARCIA
Defendant:
PHO TODAY CGH LLC, PHO TODAY EAST RUTHERFORD LLC and TU NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Staten v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2019cv00843
Defendant:
William McDonald, LeQuita Garrett, Tu Nguyen and others
Plaintiff:
Shomari Staten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tu Nguyen v. Duy Hoang, et al
as 18-20529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TU NGUYEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DUY TU HOANG, individually, also known as Dan Hoang, DIEM HOANG DO, individually, DOAN BUI, individually, also known as Ly Thai Hung and others
Tu Nguyen v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 17-20758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TU NGUYEN
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Nguyen v. Hoang et al
as 4:2017cv02060
Plaintiff:
Tu Nguyen
Defendant:
Dan Hoang, Diem Hoang Do, Doan Bui and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
