Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Nguyen v. Atuta, Inc., et al.
as 4:2026cv01218
Defendant:
ANDREW LE TV, An Thien Le, PREMIERLINE GROUP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Thanh Tu and Tu Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01173
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00681
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Nguyen
as 4:2024cv02307
Defendant:
Tu Nguyen
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gentry et al v. Memphis Bell Transportation, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
Shawn Gentry, Hoa Nguyen, Thao Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Memphis Bell Transportation, LLC and Robinson Property Group, LLC doing business as Horseshoe Tunica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jose v. Maui Electric Company, Limited et al
as 1:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jose, Chi Guyer, Krystal Cunningham and others
Defendant:
Maui Electric Company, Limited, Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GARCIA v. PHO TODAY CGH LLC et al
as 2:2023cv20629
Plaintiff:
LUIS GARCIA
Defendant:
PHO TODAY CGH LLC, PHO TODAY EAST RUTHERFORD LLC and TU NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
