Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Gonzalez v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Unknown Bustamante, Tucson Police Department, Chris Magnus and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Jesus Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cota v. Stewart et al
as 4:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Thomas M Stewart, Timothy James Anderson and Tucson Police Department
Plaintiff:
Robert Rene Cota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Guinee et al
as 4:2019cv00415
Defendant:
Michael A Kisbaugh, Eric P Hatch, Christopher Hale and others
Plaintiff:
Mark David Brown
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Vernon Edward Peltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peltz v. Guinee et al
as 4:2019cv00418
Defendant:
Michael A Kisbaugh, Eric P Hatch, Christopher Hale and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Edward Peltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tafoya v. Tucson Police Department et al
as 4:2019cv00105
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Eric Maldonado
Plaintiff:
Buddy William Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Unknown Babuta, Unknown Kerns and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2019cv00052
Defendant:
Roberto Martinez, Laura Rubicek, Tucson Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Cheyenne Lukas Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00038
Defendant:
Shane Barrett, Tucson Police Department, Tucson, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jason Brian Mathis
Defendant:
Edward Harper, Tucson, City of, Pima, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
