Cases 11 - 20 of 360
Turner v. Bolar
as 4:2023cv00851
Petitioner:
Che Turner
Respondent:
J. Bolar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Silverback Royalties, LLC v. Masten et al
as 5:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Silverback Royalties, LLC
Defendant:
Stephen P. Masten, Marilyn D. Masten, Robert T. Blick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Turner v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00040
Petitioner:
Stuart A. Turner
Respondent:
Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baker et al v. City of East Liverpool, Ohio et al
as 4:2022cv02341
Plaintiff:
Roberta L. Baker, James Johnson and Madison James & Associates
Defendant:
City of East Liverpool, Ohio, William L. Cowan, Bradley W. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. USA
as 1:2022cv01407
Petitioner:
Joseph Derrick Turner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Turner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00877
Plaintiff:
James C. Turner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tomco Metal Fabricating, Inc. v. Turner Construction Company, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02248
Plaintiff:
Tomco Metal Fabricating, Inc.
Defendant:
Turner Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Turner
as 1:2021cv02088
Petitioner:
Clifford Douglas Taylor
Defendant:
Warden Neil Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
