Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vazquez v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Francisco M Vazquez
Defendant:
Mark Kauffman, Derrick Bowlby, Luke Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TUTTLE v. STILLABOWER et al
as 1:2022cv01737
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS TUTTLE
Defendant:
TYLER STILLABOWER and CODY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUTTLE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al.
as 1:2019cv03259
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
RICHARD G. TUTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tuttle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Rhonda R Tuttle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MANN v. US PENITENTIARY- CANAAN et al
as 2:2015cv00368
Defendant:
BURKETT, DOBUSHAK, KUBIONIE and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Names Unknown:
PHARMACISTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWSAUGH v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2014cv01792
Defendant:
GREGORY D ALLEN, NICK BEAGLE, TAMARA BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN BREWSAUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TUTTLE v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01211
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
MARK TUTTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
