Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc. v. Sky Moving and Storage Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv62667
Plaintiff:
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc.
Defendant:
Sky Moving and Storage Inc. and Shirley Baruk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc. v. Empire Moving and Storage Inc.
as 0:2011cv62452
Plaintiff:
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc.
Defendant:
Empire Moving and Storage Inc. and Benny Segal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Two Men and a Truck International, Inc. v. Underwood et al
as 1:2011cv00598
Plaintiff:
Two Men and a Truck International, Inc.
Defendant:
David S. Underwood , Joleen M. Michalowicz, Moving Names, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc. v. Talley
as 5:2010cv00301
Plaintiff:
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc.
Defendant:
William Talley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc. v. Perry-Hall, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00379
Plaintiff:
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc.
Defendant:
Perry-Hall, LLC, Forrest Perry and Richard Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc. v. Garlar, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc.
Defendant:
Garlar, Inc., Paul Larosa and Moving Guys, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
VM Services, Inc. v. Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00536
Plaintiff:
VM Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Two Men and a Truck/International, Inc. and East Tennessee Moving Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TWO MEN AND A TRUCK INTERNATIONAL INC v. RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT COMPANY LLC
as 4:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
TWO MEN AND A TRUCK INTERNATIONAL INC
Defendant:
RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
