Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Isom v. Indio Mgmt at the Everly
as 21-40908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyesha N. Isom
Defendant / Appellee:
Indio Management at the Everly
Isom v. United States Senate et al
as 4:2021cv00703
Plaintiff:
Tyesha N. Isom
Defendant:
United States Senate, Senators of the 117th Congress, Jill Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Isom v. Internal Affairs State of Texas et al
as 3:2021cv02192
Plaintiff:
Tyesha N Isom and Tyesha Natalie Isom
Defendant:
Internal Affairs State of Texas, Internal Affairs State of New York, Inernal Affairs State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isom v. Chevron Corporation
as 3:2021cv01577
Plaintiff:
Tyesha N Isom
Defendant:
Chevron Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Isom v. Conde Nast/New York HQ Wired.com
as 3:2021cv01578
Plaintiff:
Tyesha N Isom
Defendant:
Conde Nast/New York HQ Wired.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Isom v. Easeware Technology Limited: Driver Easy et al
as 3:2021cv01579
Plaintiff:
Tyesha N Isom
Defendant:
Easeware Technology Limited: Driver Easy and SuperEasy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Isom v. DHS
as 21-40487
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of State and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyesha N. Isom
Isom v. Texas Historial Commissions et al
as 3:2021cv01465
Plaintiff:
Tyesha N Isom
Defendant:
Texas Historial Commissions and Vaughn Aldredge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isom v. HHS
as 21-40486
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General and United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyesha N. Isom
Isom v. Former US President Barack Obama et al
as 3:2021cv01385
Plaintiff:
Tyesha N Isom
Defendant:
Obama Administration, Barak Obama, Michelle Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
