Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Middleton v. Roseneau
as 5:2014cv01111
Petitioner:
Antonio Middleton
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steven Rollinson v. Tim Riley
as 14-6399
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN A. ROLLINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Nesbitt v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2013cv02456
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Tyger River Correctional Institution, Tim Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2013cv01978
Plaintiff:
James Holloway
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ponder v. South Carolina
as 3:2012cv01444
Petitioner:
Bobby Ponder
Respondent:
Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Melton v. Warden Tyger River
as 12-6387
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK MELTON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Melton v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2011cv03384
Petitioner:
Mark Claude Melton
Respondent:
Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patrick Guess v. Cecilia Reynold
as 11-7153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK GUESS
Defendant - Appellee:
CECILIA R. REYNOLDS, Warden, Kershaw Correctional Institution, TIMOTHY RILEY, Warden, Tyger River Institution, JON OZMINT, Agency Director and others
Littlejohn v. South Carolina Department of Cor
as 0:2011cv00889
Petitioner:
Steven W Littlejohn
Respondent:
Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Greg Gaines v. State of South Carolina
as 09-8196
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREG GAINES
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
