Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAUGHTRY v. CEKADA et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
MARTIQUE DAUGHTRY
Defendant:
CO CEKADA, CO RANKIN, CO HERKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant:
SCI FAYETTE, ERIC ARMEL, B. RUDZIENSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WALKER et al
as 2:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR A. BROWN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN WALKER, CHAPLAIN LEWIS, C.O. 1 COSTELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PALUCH et al v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv00720
Defendant:
SGT. TYNER, GEORGE LITTLE, ERIC T. ARMEL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. and WILLIE M. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LAFFEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS LAFFEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MARK CAPOZZA, CO I EMMINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TYNER v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv03957
Defendant:
BAYER S.A., BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER U.S. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFINY L. TYNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyner v. County of Lancaster et al
as 5:2018cv03306
Defendant:
Lori Hehnly, Cheryl Stemberger, COUNTY OF LANCASTER and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ray Tyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyner v. County of Lancaster et al
as 3:2018cv01509
Defendant:
Lori Hehnly, Cheryl Stemberger, County of Lancaster and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ray Tyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYNER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv67922
Plaintiff:
JAMES TYNER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
