Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jasi v. U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
as 8:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
KAREN JOHANNA JASI and Karen Johana Jasi
Defendant:
USCIS, ICE, EOIR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Hanif Khan v. Lyle Boelens
as 21-7731
Petitioner:
HANIF KHAN
Respondent:
LYLE BOELENS, in his official capacity as Acting Washington Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Buxton R. Bailey, P.C. v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 21-2011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BUXTON R. BAILEY, P.C. and PRESIDENT BUXTON REED BAILEY, Representing Buxton R. Bailey, P.C. and suing separately in his own name pro se
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary Department of Homeland Security, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director of U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services, SUSAN DIBBINS, Chief Administrative Appeals Office and others
Jose Tejada v. David O'Neill
as 21-7077
Petitioner:
JOSE DENIS CARDONA TEJADA
Respondent:
DAVID C. O'NEILL, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Washington Field Office, MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Douglas Leke v. Russell Hott
as 21-6681
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS LEKE
Respondent:
RUSSELL HOTT, in his official capacity as Washington Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JEFFREY CRAWFORD, in his official capacity as superintendent, ICA-Farmville and MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Christian Alberto Garcia v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 20-2142
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALBERTO SANTOS CHRISTIAN GARCIA, JERBIN IVAN GARCIA GARCIA, ISMAEL CASTILLO GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U. S. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, RUSSELL HOTT, Field Office Director for the Washington Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Defendant:
IMMIGRATION CENTERS OF AMERICA, LLC, ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and JERRY L. CRAWFORD
Doe v. Wolf et al
as 3:2020cv00481
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
USCIS, Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Francois Toure v. Russell Hott
as 20-6695
Respondent / Appellee:
FIELD OFFICE DIR. RUSSELL HOTT, in his official capacity as Washington Field Office Director, of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, COLONEL PAUL PERRY, in his official capacity as Superintendent, Caroline Detention Facility, JEFFERY CRAWFORD, in his official capacity as Warden, Farmville Detention Center, Immigration Centers of America and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANCOIS TOURE, UMMY MOHAMED, SISIRA KUMARA KUMARAGAMAGE DON and others
Howard Duncan v. Jack Kavanagh
as 20-6501
Respondent:
DIANE WITTE, in her official capacity as Field Office Director, Maryland Field Office, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, JACK KAVANAGH, in his official capacity as Director, Howard County Detention Center, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Acting Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
HOWARD EGBA DUNCAN
Howard Duncan v. Jack Kavanagh
as 20-6502
Respondent / Appellee:
DIANE WITTE, in her official capacity as Field Office Director, Maryland Field Office, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, JACK KAVANAGH, in his official capacity as Director, Howard County Detention Center and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
HOWARD EGBA DUNCAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
