Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 1:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
U.S. Secretary of Defense, U.S. Secretary of State, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense, The et al
as 4:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
U.S. Secretary of Defense, The, U.S. Secretary of State, The and U.S. Attorney General, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2193
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv04112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
In re: Knox
as 12-7060
Petitioner:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Respondent:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Davis v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 1:2012cv02122
Plaintiff:
Alton Davis
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney's Office, U.S. ATF Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Flores v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2011cv01036
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Sierra Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 11-1106
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENYS RAY HUGHES
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al, RENE GARCIA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT, et al and others
Barbour v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
