Cases 1 - 10 of 18
State of Texas v. DHS
as 23-50869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute and Center for Renewing America, Incorporated
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor:
State of New Jersey
Indiana, State of et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Indiana, State of, North Dakota, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023mi00015
Plaintiff:
The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
Nancy Huisha-Huisha, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-5200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Nancy Gimena Huisha-Huisha, and her minor child, L.M.C.H., Valeria Macancela Bermejo, and her minor daughter and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, William A. Ferrara, Executive Assistant Commissioner, CBP Office of Field Operations, in his official capacity, Raul L. Ortiz, Chief of U.S. Border Patrol, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
T. Alexander Aleinikoff, Deborah Anker, James C. Hathaway and others
P.J.E.S. v. Peter Gaynor, et al
as 20-5357
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew T. Albence, Deputy Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Robert R. Redfield, Dr., Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in his official capacity, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
P.J.E.S., a minor child, by and through his father and next friend, Mario Escobar Francisco, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Amicus Curiae:
Natalia Molina, Gerald L. Neuman, Julian Lim and others
Jane Doe, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-15850
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK A. MORGAN, Commissioner, U.S. Customs & Border Protection, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, JEFFREY SELF, Commander, Arizona Joint Field Command and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORLAN FLORES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JANE DOE, # 2 and JANE DOE, # 1
Jane Doe, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-15741
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY SELF, Commander, Arizona Joint Field Command, RODNEY S. SCOTT, Chief, U.S. Border Patrol,, MANUEL PADILLA, Jr., Chief Patrol Agent-Tucson Sector and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE, # 1, JANE DOE, # 2 and NORLAN FLORES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Cristian Doe, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-55279
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN SCUDDER, Acting Chief Patrol Agent, U.S. Border Patrol El Centro Sector, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN DOE and DIANA DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
