Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Guerra Rosales v. Nielsen et al.
as 7:2018cv03176
Defendant:
Kirstjen M. Nielsen , U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement , U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Griselda Guerra Rosales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OJEDIS v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2011cv01559
Petitioner:
TSUILANG OJEDIS
Respondent:
JANET NAPOLITANO , U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT , U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Puerta v. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2009cv00502
Plaintiff:
Natalia Puerta
Defendant:
Department of Justice and U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2009cv02173
Petitioner:
Norman Anthony Thomas
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sabbat v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv10808
Petitioner:
Jean Ehwin Sabbat
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gonzalez v. U.S. Citizenship Immigration Services
as 1:2007cv02103
Petitioner:
Jose Ivan Perea Gonzalez
Respondent:
U.S. Citizenship Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Nguyen v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 3:2007cv01065
Petitioner:
Cuong Viet Nguyen
Respondent:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and Louise Germain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MEJIA v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 1:2007cv01645
Petitioner:
AURELIO MEJIA
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
