Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JAMES v. B.O.P et al.
as 1:2022cv02806
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JAMES
Defendant:
B.O.P., US ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. CONGRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURAN v. U.S. CONGRESS et al
as 1:2020cv02548
Defendant:
STATE LEGISLATIVE and U.S. CONGRESS
Plaintiff:
DAVID DURAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R. Johnson v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 19-5356
Defendant / Appellee:
Board Gov., USP, Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General and A. Cortez, U.S. Congress
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. Wayne Johnson
MENEFEE v. RUBIN et al
as 1:2019cv01042
Defendant:
PAUL RYAN, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, WORLD BANK and others
Plaintiff:
ELGEN MENEFEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2016cv02058
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, KAMALA D. HARRIS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL DIVISION, U.S. CONGRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015mc01847
Petitioner:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Respondent:
BARACK H. OBAMA and U.S. CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
CUNNINGHAM v. U.S. CONGRESS' HOUSE ETHICS COMMITTEE et al
as 1:2012cv01935
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
U.S. CONGRESS' HOUSE ETHICS COMMITTEE and JOSE E. SERRANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Jones v. TREA, et al
as 12-5094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Treasury, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
