Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Caraffa v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1644
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA, named as Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named Judges of the Superior Court, ANN A. SCOTT TIMMER, Duty Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court and others
Caraffa v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al.
as 24-1611
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Employees of the U.S. District Court of Arizona, in Official and Individual Capacities, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Marcello Cooper v. U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
as 23-70151
Petitioner:
MARCELLO COOPER
Respondent:
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, 9TH CIRCUIT
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, State of Louisiana, City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. USDC-AZP
as 22-70180
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, OFFICE OF THE STAFF ATTORNEYS FOR THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS and others
Petitioner:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 6:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
