Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Hightower v. Director et al
as 3:2013cv01538
Plaintiff:
Dionne R. Hightower
Defendant:
Director, United Kingdom of Great Britain, Social Security Administration Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. U.S. District Court et al
as 2:2012cv02458
Petitioner:
Marlowe Brown
Respondent:
U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Delmo Torrefranca v. William Suter, et al
as 11-15216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELMO FIGURA TORREFRANCA, AKA Delmo F. Torrefranca
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, Clerk of the Court, U.S. Supreme Court, ERIK A. FOSSUM, Deputy Clerk, U.S. Supreme Court, CATHY A. CATTERSON, Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnny Choinski v. USDCLA
as 10-70595
:
In re: JOHNNY CHOINSKI
Petitioner:
JOHNNY CHOINSKI
Respondent:
USDC, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
OFFICE OF THE CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.
Sampson v U.S. Court of Appeals
as 2:2010cv00405
Petitioner:
Tony Andre Sampson
Respondent:
U.S. Court of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tony Andre Sampson v U.S. Court of Appeals
as 2:2010cv00823
Petitioner:
Tony Andre Sampson
Respondent:
U.S. Court of Appeals
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luevano v. Reid et al
as 3:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
