Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MURRAY v. THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM et al
as 2:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
LONDON MURRAY
Defendant:
THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, E PLURIBUS UNUM-THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GORDON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 2:2018cv02030
Plaintiff:
AVA GORDON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
EUFROSINA v. GATES et al
as 2:2008cv03633
Plaintiff:
DIACONU EUFROSINA
Defendant:
ROBERT GATES, STEVE JOHNSTON, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCRACKEN v. BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv02934
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC, JEFFERSON SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC, OAK RIDGE ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GOMIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv02442
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE GOMIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BREVETTI v. CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67520
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO BREVETTI
Defendant:
CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC., U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
