Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Singh et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 2:2018cv01210
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State and Michael R. Pompeo
Plaintiff:
Gurnek Singh and Pawan Deep Kaur
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Pars Equality Center et al v. Pompeo et al
as 2:2018cv01122
Plaintiff:
AFSHIN RAGHEBI, OneAmerica, MALAYEEN AHMED and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Kevin K. McAleenan, Kirstjen Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Doe et al v. Donald Trump, President of The United States et al
as 2:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe , John Doe and Episcopal Diocese of Olympia
Defendant:
Donald Trump, U.S. Department of State, Rex Tillerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
