Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Open Entry Services, et al. v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 23-2202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OPEN ENTRY SERVICES, a prepositional service provider of the United States and BRITTIAN WILLIE YOUNG, SR., Prepositional Negotiator for O.E.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, a territory of the U.S., UNKNOWN PARTY, named as ADEQ in original complaint, as state entity administrator, UNKNOWN PARTY 2, named as ADOCS in original complaint, as state entity administrator and others
Almonte v. U.S. Clerk Offices Employees et al
as 3:2021cv00151
Defendant:
U.S. Clerk Offices Employees, U.S. Judges and U.S. District Attorney's
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Almonte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
In re: Drelijah J. Muhammad-Ali
as 2:2020mc00315
Plaintiff:
XYZ Indigenous Aborinal 28,000 B.C. Natives American Citizens, Drelijah Muhammad-Ali and Al-Rabat Morocco Empire Kindgdom Islamic Sovereignty Nation 37-1880026
Defendant:
XYZ Employees Clerks and Paralegal, U.S. Supreme Court Judges Justices Employees, Royal Court of Justice Coat of Arms of Alabama and others
Mehmood v. Delaney et al
as 2:2015cv01818
Defendant:
11 Board of Governors, USPS, 12 Board Members, CCA, Administrative Office of the United States Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Derek Todd v. William CANBY, et al
as 13-17667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. CANBY, U.S. Judge and RICHARD R. CLIFTON, U.S. Judge
Michael Flinner v. R. George, et al
as 12-55817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FLINNER
Defendant - Appellee:
R. GEORGE, California Supreme Court Justice, M. LUCAS, California Supreme Court Justice, M. BAXTER, California Supreme Court Justice and others
Spencer Brasure v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-55743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPENCER RAWLINS BRASURE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Ex Governor, R. GEORGE, California Supreme Court Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
