Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bullock v. Woosley et al
as 4:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bullock
Defendant:
Jason Woosley, Ted Rogers, Robbie Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. U.S. Marshal
as 4:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bennett
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Woosley et al
as 4:2021cv00109
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
Jason Woosley, U.S. Marshal Services, Grayson Co Dept Cor. and others
Not Classified By Court:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jabbi v. U.S. Marshall for E.D. of Kentucky et al
as 5:2019cv00397
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall for E.D. of Kentucky, Southern Health Partners and Woodford County Jail
Plaintiff:
Abdourahman Jabbi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alkhub v. Louisville County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00101
Defendant:
John Doe#1, John Doe#4, Lucas County Jail & Detention and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Hamdan Alkhub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018cv00052
Petitioner:
Corey A. Thorson
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017cv00447
Petitioner:
Ulysses Williams
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Marshal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Price v. Unknown U.S. Marshal et al
as 1:2016cv00199
Plaintiff:
Allen Price
Defendant:
Unknown U.S. Marshal, Unknown Warren County Kentucky Jail Captain and Jerry Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. U.S. Marshal et al
as 6:2016cv00070
Petitioner:
Brian Baker
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 4:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Earnest Otto Smith
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Grayson County Detention Center, Assistant U.S Attorney David Wieser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
