Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Jones v. Brown et al
as 5:2023ct03113
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Levon Jones
Defendant:
Ms. Brown, John Doe U.S. Marshal and Jane Doe U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS TUCKER
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shine v. U.S. Marshall
as 3:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
Kerry Shine
Respondent:
U.S. Marshall
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCNEILL v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2022cv01044
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LAVON MCNEILL
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022hc02153
Petitioner:
Martinez Orlandis Black
Respondent:
Billy Cooper and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Burkhardt v. US Department of Justice et al
as 5:2022ct03247
Plaintiff:
Stanley Carl Burkhardt
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MEYERS v. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE et al
as 1:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE, U.S. ATTORNEY, U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. U.S. Marshal
as 5:2021hc02200
Petitioner:
Deondre Montreal Russell
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stokes v. U.S. Marshal Service
as 3:2020cv00599
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service
Petitioner:
George Victor Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jennings v. U.S. Homeland Security et al
as 5:2020hc02084
Petitioner:
Brandon Marquis Jennings and Mustafa Bey
Respondent:
U.S. Government, U.S. of America, U.S. Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
