Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Coleman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2023cv14166
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Coleman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
SAMUEL v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2017cv01962
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SAMUEL
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, B.O.P. and JULIAN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Margaret Mable v. United States District Court f, et al
as 16-36080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET MABLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Medved v. U.S. Department of Justice et al.
as 4:2016cv02334
Plaintiff:
John Edward Medved
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mable v. United States District Court of Western Washington et al
as 2:2016cv00697
Plaintiff:
Margaret Mable
Defendant:
United States District Court of Western Washington and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2014cv00261
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. TURNER, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TURNER JR. v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. TURNER, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HURT et al v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2012cv05932
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT and WILLIAM T. TURNER
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tyrone Hunt v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 12-16707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
STODDARD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2012cv00857
Plaintiff:
KEITH STODDARD
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., DAVID WYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
