Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jonathan D. Chang v. Government of the U.S. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv03734
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Chang
Defendant:
Government of the U.S. State of California, Governor Gavin Newsom, Department of General Services Office of Risk and Insurance Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Bonilla v. USDC Eastern District of CA
as 2:2023cv01911
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
U.S. State District Court Eastern District of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Banks v. Mr. Robert Hyde et al
as 2:2020cv00979
Respondent:
Former Ambassador to Ukraine, Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. State Department and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Torres v. Pompeo
as 3:2019cv04752
Defendant:
Michael Richard Pompeo, Secretary, U.S. State Department and Michael R. Pompeo
Plaintiff:
Armando Torres
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iegorova v. U.S. State Department
as 2:2018cv01580
Plaintiff:
Liudmyla Iegorova
Defendant:
U.S. State Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricardo Marquez v. North Hollywood Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv06267
Defendant:
Chief Special Agent Embassy of U.S. States, Special Agent Anson K. Garlinton, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Marquez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ha v. New York City Housing Authority et al
as 4:2011mc80020
Plaintiff:
Hung Ha
Defendant:
New York City Housing Authority, U.S. Department of Education and U.S. State Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
