Cases 1 - 6 of 6
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America, et al v. Schoitz Engineering Inc.
as 6:2023cv02073
Plaintiff:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America; and UAW Local 838, International Union, United Automotive, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and UAW Local 838
Defendant:
Schoitz Engineering Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 207 Application for order confirming award of arbitrators
International Union et al v. Trane U.S. Inc.
as 2:2018cv02203
Plaintiff:
UAW Local 716, AFL-CIO, United Automobile and others
Defendant:
Trane U.S. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
International Union et al v. Trane U.S. Inc.
as 2:2017cv02219
Plaintiff:
International Union , United Automobile , Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and others
Defendant:
Trane U.S. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Trane U.S. Inc. v. International Union United Automobile , Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) Local 716
as 2:2011cv02005
Plaintiff:
Trane U.S. Inc.
Defendant:
International Union United Automobile , Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) Local 716
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Dedicated Logistics, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 0:2009cv00422
Plaintiff:
Dedicated Logistics, Inc., Dedicated Logistics, Inc. and Dedicated Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Meyer v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation et al
as 4:2008cv00533
Plaintiff:
Edward Meyer
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation-UAW Pension Board of Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
