Cases 1 - 5 of 5
USA v. Approx. $73,212.71, et al.,
as 2:2024mc00204
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $73,212.71 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009403, Approximately $13,738.24 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009438, Approximately $1,378,783.42 seized from UBS AG account number GE 46907 and others
Claimant:
Run It Up, Inc. and Won It All, Inc.
United States of America v. Approximately $73,212.71 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009403 et al
as 2:2024at00632
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $73,212.71 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009403, Approximately $13,738.24 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009438, Approximately $1,378,783.42 seized from UBS AG account number GE 46907 and others
United States of America v. $3,749,960.40 seized from TD Ameritrade Account No. 942304361 et al
as 3:2019cv00564
Defendant:
$42,000.00 seized from Sandy Spring Bank Account Number: 1678833001, $255,287.02 seized from UBS AG Account Number: UH-36477, $595,000.00 seized from Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States Of America v. Any and All Funds in UBS AG, Account Number XXXX1138 et al
as 1:2013cv00761
Respondent:
2005 Raytheon Aircraft Company Beechcraft King Air B200, 2005 Raytheon Aircraft Company Hawker 800XPi, Any and All Funds in UBS AG, Account Number XXXX1138 and others
Claimant:
Francisco Colorado Cessa and Maria Emma Salman Rocha
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. All Fund on Deposit at UBS AG, Account No. 101-WA-358967-000, held in the name of Wegelin & Co.
as 1:2012cv00836
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All Fund on Deposit at UBS AG, Account No. 101-WA-358967-000, held in the name of Wegelin & Co.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
