Cases 1 - 6 of 6
HEADLEE et al v. WEST VIRGINIA UNITED HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
ALICE HEADLEE and MARISA WALLACE
Defendant:
West Virginia United Health System, Inc. and UNIONTOWN HOSPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
HEADLEE et al v. WEST VIRGINIA UNITED HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
ALICE HEADLEE and MARISA WALLACE
Defendant:
WEST VIRGINIA UNITED HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and UNIONTOWN HOSPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Heard et al v. West Virginia United Health System, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Dominique Heard, Amanda Luzader and Kenneth Miklich
Defendant:
West Virginia United Health System, Inc., West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc., Community Health Association doing business as Jackson General Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ware v. West Virginia University Medical Corporation
as 1:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Tammy Ware
Defendant:
West Virginia University Medical Corporation, West Virginia United Health System, Inc., West Virginia University Hospital, Inc. doing business as J.W. Ruby Memorial Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
SHAFFER v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv01667
Plaintiff:
MARIE K. SHAFFER and MARIE K. BROOKS
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNIONTOWN HOSPITAL LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BROOKS v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv00667
Plaintiff:
MARIE K. BROOKS
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP, UNIONTOWN HOSPITAL WEEKLY DISABILITY INCOME INSURANCE PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
