Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Raymond Interior Systems, Inc., et al v. Plasterers Local No. 200, et al
as 09-55331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND INTERIOR SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS & JOINERS OF AMERICA and SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
PLASTERERS LOCAL NO. 200, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
OPERATIVE PLASTERERS' & CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES & CANADA, AFL-CIO and PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
Trustees of the Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Five Seasons Paint and Drywall, Inc
as 1:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois, Trustees of the Five Rivers District Council Joint Apprenticeship Committee Fund and others
Defendant:
Five Seasons Paint and Drywall, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SW Regional Council of Carp v. Plasterers Local No. 200
as 09-55295
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND INTERIOR SYSTEMS, INC. and UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS & JOINERS OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Defendant:
PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY and OPERATIVE PLASTERERS' & CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES & CANADA, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellee:
PLASTERERS LOCAL NO. 200, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, AFL-CIO
Raymond Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Plasterers Local No. 200, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, AFL-CIO et al
as 2:2008cv06445
Plaintiff:
Raymond Interior Systems, Inc., United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America and others
Defendant:
Plasterers Local No. 200, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, AFL-CIO, Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association of the United States & Canada, AFL-CIO and Plan for the Settlement of Jurisdictional Disputes in the Construction Industry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Chemtura Corporation Inc v. Lake Charles Metal Trades Council et al
as 2:2008cv01424
Plaintiff:
Chemtura Corp
Defendant:
Lake Charles Metal Trades Council, Local 407 International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 861 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dilacio v. New York City District Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America et al
as 1:2008cv06959
Plaintiff:
George Dilacio, Jr.
Defendant:
New York City District Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, New York City District Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Michael J. Forde and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Time Square Construction, Inc. v. Building and Construction Trades Council of Greater New York et al
as 1:2007cv07403
Plaintiff:
Time Square Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Building and Construction Trades Council of Greater New York, Enterprise Association of Steamfitters Local 638 of the United Association, Cement and Concrete Workers Local 20 of the Laborers International Union of North America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hoffman Construction Company of Oregon v. Pacific Northwest Regional Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America et al
as 3:2007cv00860
Plaintiff:
Hoffman Construction Company of Oregon and Hoffman Construction Company of Oregon
Defendant:
Pacific Northwest Regional Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America and Exterior & Interior Specialists Local 2154
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
