Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
GLASS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICES (UPS) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv19839
Defendant: JAKE DOE SELLERS (1-10), ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: JR. MICHAEL GLASS and MICHAEL GLASS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00425
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUNTER v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS), INC.
as 2:2017cv02735
Plaintiff: ANTOINETTE HUNTER
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS), INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIDSON v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS) et al
as 2:2011cv00894
Plaintiff: DAVID DAVIDSON
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS) , CRAWFORD & CO. , JOHN DOE 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PISKO v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS), INC. et al
as 1:2007cv05680
Plaintiff: HAROLD "BUD" PISKO
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS), INC., JOSEPH ALOI, JEFF MINISCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
RICHES v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv04009
Plaintiff: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REILLY v. FKI LOGISTEX et al
as 2:2007cv04183
Plaintiff: DANIEL REILLY
Defendant: FKI LOGISTEX, DAVCO, INDIAN INDUSTRIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RICHES v. BUSH et al Featured Case
as 2:2006cv01055
Defendant: USAMA BIN LADEN, SHADY RECORDS INC, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Plaintiff: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Petitioner: DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH and PATRICK J. SIMPSON
Not Yet Classified: M. C. HAMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?