Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Shahnam Davani v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv06015
Petitioner:
Shahnam Davani
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Linda Sanders and Charles Grigg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garmon Coats v. United States Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 1:2008cv00666
Petitioner:
Garmon Coats
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons (BOP), United States Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and United States Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Johnson et al v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2008cv01155
Plaintiff:
Kurt F. Johnson and Deborah Jean Welsh
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, FDC Dublin, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Randy Walker v. J L Norwood et al
as 5:2008cv00135
Petitioner:
Randy Walker
Respondent:
J L Norwood and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Allan Steven Boren v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv00676
Plaintiff:
Allan Steven Boren and Allan Steven Boren
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Warren A Doucet, II and DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Moreno v. United States of America et al
as 1:2007cv01630
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Bureau of Prisons, Wackenhut Corrections Corporation, a business form unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moreno v. United States of America et al
as 1:2007at00558
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Bureau of Prisons, Wackenhut Corrections Corporation, a business form unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
